MacDirectory magazine is the premiere creative lifestyle magazine for Apple enthusiasts featuring interviews, in-depth tech reviews, Apple news, insights, latest Apple patents, apps, market analysis, entertainment and more.
Issue link: https://digital.macdirectory.com/i/1522076
In April 2022, Apple came under scrutiny when the Photos app was discovered to have blocked photos taken at sites related to the Holocaust. A team of journalists at the tech website 9to5Mac were analyzing an iPhone beta update, when they found a list of 12 “sensitive locations” set to be excluded from Memories. These locations included the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp and the Berlin Holocaust Memorial. 9to5Mac described the block as an attempt to avoid the creation of “unwanted memories.” My recent study examined the comment section of the original 9to5Mac article to gauge how iPhone users and readers reacted to this news. The response illuminated a host of concerns about the ways Apple scans users’ personal photographs for the automated creation of Memories. User frustration Memories is a feature in the Apple Photos app that automatically curates content to create personalized slideshows. Using artificial intelligence, Memories claims to identify the important people, places and events in the Photos app libraries of its users. Many iPhone users store thousands of photographs on their devices and often even more on Apple’s iCloud service. Managing this unprecedented amount of personal photographs is no small task, and we increasingly rely on automated tools to help us revisit and reflect upon important moments in our lives. News of the block raised concerns about how our interactions with the past are being shaped by the technologies we employ to remember. The block was based on geotags, a form of metadata that identifies the geographic location where a photograph was taken. The journalists also noted that the list could be updated in future iOS updates. iPhone users took to the comment section of the 9to5Mac article to voice their concerns, and the discussion revealed a growing amount of skepticism, alarm and dissatisfaction. Some users voiced their frustration with the lack of customization in the Memories feature, while others equated the move with outright censorship. Many took the opportunity to speculate on what other types of content Apple may attempt to block from appearing in Memories down the line. Given the gravity of the history targeted through this measure, some commentors considered the potential stakes of developments like these. A comment by user Paul Martin reflected on the potential impact of forgetting: “Let’s not sanitise the world and forget our past or we risk repeating our mistakes.” Memory management The move was generally seen as an overstep by Apple, which has long faced criticism for its “closed world” approach to hardware and software development. By limiting access to the internal workings of their products and services, many users felt increasingly restricted by Apple’s offerings. The Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp was one of the sensitive locations restricted from the iPhone Memories feature. Image by Malek bee, Unsplash